Open Access

Experimental analysis of bonded single lap joint with flexible adhesive

Applied Adhesion Science20142:1

DOI: 10.1186/2196-4351-2-1

Received: 27 August 2013

Accepted: 25 September 2013

Published: 29 January 2014


Flexible adhesives play an important role in various applications. The possibility of bonding dissimilar substrates has generated wide interest in flexible adhesives. However, most of the theoretical and experimental investigations have focused on rigid epoxy adhesives. The purpose of this work is to investigate the mechanical behavior of a flexible adhesive joint in the overlap region. Aluminum adherends were used for single lap joint made with an adhesive characterized by high flexibility and large strains. The specimen was tested in tension. Full-field displacements of the overlap region were measured by the Digital Image Correlation method. A large shear strain of the order of 48% was observed. Small transverse deflections of the adherends were estimated. Also, it was observed that the shear strain distribution in the adhesive layer decreases at the overlap ends, which is different from previously reported results in the literature.


Flexible adhesive Single lap joint Digital image correlation


Knowledge of adhesion has a great importance for many bonded structures, mainly in automotive, aircraft and marine structures. A better understanding of the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded joints necessitates a detailed investigation of the adherend and adhesive, as well as of the adherend-adhesive interface. The majority of stiff adhesives are employed in structural applications, while flexible adhesives are indicated for some particular cases. The use of flexible adhesives in engineering structures allows displacement between joints and can avoid structural failure. For instance, they may be used for bonding dissimilar substrates that present different coefficients of thermal expansion.

Several investigations have been concerned with mechanical behavior of bonded joints. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints were established through the efforts of Volkersen [1], Goland and Reissner [2] and Hart-Smith [3]. An improvement to classical models of bonded lap joints has been proposed by Tsai et al. [4]. Luo and Tong [5] presented a nonlinear analysis of single lap joints. A good literature review on theoretical models for bonded joints is summarized in the literature [6, 7]. Recent publications show that bonded joints remain being extensively studied [810]. Full-field optical methods such as Moiré and Digital Image Correlation have been employed to determine strain fields of adhesively bonded joints [1115].

Although there are many works on adhesively bonded joints, only a relatively few involve flexible adhesives. For instance, two different flexible adhesives were investigated by means of adhesive joint tests [16]. Stress distributions in single lap joint made with flexible adhesive were studied using finite element analysis [17]. Recently, experiments and simulations of single lap bonded joints and their application in a boat structure were presented [18]. In addition, the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesive and the mechanical behavior of different flexible adhesives were analyzed [19, 20].

This study was designed to investigate experimentally the mechanical behavior of a flexible adhesive joint in the overlap region. Aluminum adherends were used for single lap joint (SLJ) made with an adhesive characterized by high flexibility and large strains. The specimen was tested under monotonic tensile load in quasi-static condition. For each load, an image of the overlap region of the specimen was captured. All images were processed using a homemade program based on the Digital Image Correlation. Thus, horizontal and vertical displacement fields were obtained.


A single lap joint (SLJ) configuration was considered in the present study. The aluminum substrate surfaces received a treatment that consisted of abrading the overlap region using a sandblasting machine and cleaning it with acetone before application of the adhesive. A flexible adhesive based on silane modified polymer, Cascola Flextec®FT 101, from Henkel (São Paulo, Brazil) was used. The mold illustrated in Figure 1 was used to make up the SLJ specimen. Using this mold, the final geometry of the SLJ specimen had an overlap joint of 33.5 mm, a joint width of 25.3 mm, and adhesive and adherends thicknesses of 0.15 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The elastic modulus of aluminum alloy plates was 68 GPa and the shear modulus of the adhesive was 0.52 MPa. It is important to remark that the adhesive is characterized by high flexibility and large strains [21, 22].
Figure 1

Mold for single lap joint specimen.

The single lap joint was loaded in tension on an apparatus developed to ensure that one of the adherends moved parallel towards the applied load. The SLJ specimen was tested under monotonic tensile load in quasi-static condition and at room temperature, i.e., approximately 25°C. Figure 2 shows a close-up of the experimental arrangement that was composed by the SLJ specimen fixed to the apparatus and a high resolution CCD camera with 1376x1024 pixels in the sensor array and a 10xZoom C-Mount lens.
Figure 2

Experimental setup.

In the experimental procedure, the lateral surface of SLJ specimen was sprayed with black paint for obtaining a random speckle pattern. This process is essential to obtain the displacement fields using the optical method described below. The surface of overlap region covered with random speckle pattern is illustrated in Figure 3. In this picture, the rectangle drawn on the surface was chosen as the region of analysis. All specimen images in undeformed and deformed states associated with applied loads were captured with the CCD camera.
Figure 3

SLJ specimen with the region of analysis (a) and random speckle pattern on specimen surface (b).

The displacement fields were measured using an optical method, which is known as Digital Image Correlation (DIC). This powerful optical-numerical method measures full-field surface displacements. DIC method is noncontact and relatively noninvasive. In the correlation procedure, small subsets from the undeformed image are compared to subsets from each of the deformed images in order to match maximum correlation between them and hence the displacements are determined. If the initial position of each subset is known, and its final position can be estimated, it is possible to compute the in-plane displacement fields designated by u(x, y) and v(x, y) associated with x- and y-coordinates. More information about this method can be found in the literature [23, 24].

In the current work, a homemade DIC code based on a normalized cross-correlation function was used to obtain displacement fields with accuracy of the order of ±0.01 pixels. All acquired images were selected at 1314x199 pixel resolution. In order to perform the matching process, reference and target subsets of 51x51 and 31x31 were respectively chosen. The system was calibrated considering a scale factor value equal to 38 pixel/mm.

Results and discussion

In this section, horizontal and vertical displacement fields of adherends and adhesive in the overlap region are presented. As already indicated in Figure 3, the overlap region was defined as the region of analysis. Figure 4 illustrates the horizontal displacement field, denoted by u(x,y), of the overlap region for an applied load equal to 350 N. The vertical displacement field, denoted by v(x,y), of the overlap region for the same load is shown in Figure 5. These displacement maps were obtained using a homemade DIC code.
Figure 4

Horizontal displacement field of SLJ specimen at the overlap region: (a) color map and (b) surface plot.

Figure 5

Vertical displacement field of SLJ specimen at the overlap region: (a) color map and (b) surface plot.

As previously described in Section 2, one end of the lower adherend was kept fixed to the apparatus while the other end was bonded to the upper adherend, in which the load was applied. It is important to remark that no type of failures was observed, considering the applied loads. As can be seen in Figure 4, there is no horizontal displacement of the lower adherend, while the upper adherend presents an uniform displacement on the order of 0.07 mm and no significant deformation of the adherend is observed. Accordingly, the adhesive deforms in shear. Moreover, it should be noted that both lower and upper adherends present a rotation in the x-y plane, as shown in Figure 5. Neglecting rotations and considering only the initial thickness of the adhesive layer (0.15 mm), an angular distortion equal to 0.47 is achieved.

Besides the observed rotation in the joint, vertical displacements of lower and upper adherends at the edge of the overlap are different. This effect is related to the eccentric loading path of the SLJ that generates bending moments of the adherends. Due to the geometry and mechanical properties of adherends/adhesive, the effect of peel stress is more pronounced. To illustrate lower and upper adherends deflections, mean values of the vertical displacement of each adherend along y-direction were taken. Figure 6 shows these mean values for lower and upper adherends, considering applied loads equal to 113, 230 and 350 N. It should be noted that, as the applied load increases, adherends deflections and the adhesive thickness at the edge of overlap increase as well. Nevertheless, this effect was not observed in cases with adherend stiffness much larger than the adhesive stiffness [25].
Figure 6

Vertical displacements of upper and lower adherends at the overlap region.

To analyze the effects in the joint for the current case, i.e. aluminum adherends and high flexible adhesive, values of shear and normal strain were investigated. Shear and normal strains of the adhesive were obtained substituting the data illustrated in Figure 6 into the following definitions:
γ xy = u upper u lower h x and ϵ yy = v upper x v lower x h exp
with the adhesive thickness defined by h(x) = hexp + [v upper (x) − v lower (x)]. Where u upper and u lower , v upper and v lower denote the horizontal and vertical displacements of upper and lower adherends, respectively. The initial adhesive thickness is denoted as h exp . Figure 7 presents shear and normal strains in the adhesive layer along the x-coordinate for different applied loads. It can be clearly seen that shear strain decreases at the edge of the overlap, while there is an increase of normal strain.
Figure 7

Shear and normal strains of adhesive at the overlap region.

It is well known that the eccentric load applied to a SLJ specimen generates a combined effect of bending moment and transverse force. The magnitude of each effect depends on adherend and adhesive stiffnesses, specimen geometry and loading conditions. In fact, shear is often associated with peeling forces. Works found in the literature indicate that the shear strain in the adhesive layer increases at the edge of the overlap. In the present case, however, a different result was observed. It is important to emphasize that the adhesive stiffness used in this work is low in comparison to the adherends stiffness. Also, the adhesive is an elastomer, such that it is characterized by high flexibility and large deformation. Adams et al.[26] investigated two types of joint configuration that remove the stress concentration from the ends of the lap by profiling the adhesive layer. They used different rubbers to represent the adherends and adhesives and concluded that an adhesive joint could display a lower shear stress at the ends of the lap than in the middle, due to joint configuration. For that reason, the obtained results in the current work are suitable.

In order to facilitate the comprehension of this phenomenon, a schematic representation of a single lap joint in a deformed configuration is depicted in Figure 8. The dashed line denotes an adhesive deformation (angular distortion of γ2) that would be generated only by transverse load, while the other configuration is obtained if the bending moment and peel effect are taken into account, which is placed with an angular distortion of γ1. In this case, γ2 > γ1 at the edges of the overlap, but they tend to the same value in the middle of the overlap.
Figure 8

Schematic representation of a single lap joint bonded with a flexible adhesive.


The behavior of a single lap joint made with a flexible adhesive and aluminum adherends was experimentally investigated. The Digital Image Correlation method was employed for estimating the horizontal and vertical displacement fields at the overlap region of the single lap joint specimen. Vertical displacements associated to small adherend deflections were observed. Results indicate that the adhesive thickness was not equal along the horizontal coordinate. In fact, adhesive thickness was larger at the edge of the overlap due to eccentric loads and adhesive stiffness. Using the measured displacements, values of shear and normal strains in the adhesive layer were determined. Contrary to results from previous works found in the literature, shear strain decreased at the edge of the overlap. It is important to remark that a similar effect was observed by Adams et al. It should be noted that this study has examined only displacements and deformation. As a closing remark, one should mention that the current work might be used to support recent investigation based on finite element method. Moreover, analytical models of adhesively bonded joints may be developed assuming that the adhesive is a hyperelastic material.



The financial support of Rio de Janeiro State Funding, FAPERJ, and Research and Teaching National Council, CNPq, are gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratory of Opto-Mechanics (LOM/LMTA), Department of Mechanical Engineering/PGMEC, Universidade Federal Fluminense, UFF


  1. Volkersen O: Die Nietkraftverleitung in zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen mit konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtforschung 1938, 15: 41–47.Google Scholar
  2. Goland M, Reissner E: The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech 1944, 11: A17-A27.Google Scholar
  3. Hart-Smith JL: Analysis and Design of Advanced Composite Bonded joints. Washington-DC: NASA Report, no. CR- 2218; 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Tsai MY, Oplinger DW, Morton J: Improved theoretical solutions for adhesive lap joints. Int J Solids Struct 1998, 35: 1163–1185. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Luo Q, Tong L: Fully-coupled nonlinear analysis of single lap adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct 2007, 44: 2349–2370. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, Spelt JK: Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part I: Literature survey. Int J Adhes Adhes 2009, 29: 319–330. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, Wang A, Spelt JK: Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: Comparative study. Int J Adhes Adhes 2009, 29: 331–341. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Karachalios EF, Adams RD, da Silva LFM: Strength of single lap joints with artificial defects. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 45: 69–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Vijaya Kumar RL, Bhat MR, Murthy CRL: Evaluation of kissing bond in composite adhesive lap joints using digital image correlation: Preliminary studies. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 42: 60–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernasconi A, Jamil A, Moroni F, Pirondi A: A study on fatigue crack propagation in thick composite adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fatigue 2013, 50: 18–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tsai MY, Morton J: An experimental investigation of nonlinear deformations in single-lap joints. Mech Mater 1995, 20: 183–194. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00056-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moutrille MP, Derrien K, Baptiste D, Balandraud X, Grédiac M: Through-thickness strain field measurement in a composite/aluminum adhesive joint. Compos Part A 2009, 40(8):985–996. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Colavito KW, Das M, Hahs D, Gorman J, Madenci E, Smeltzer SS III: Digital Image Correlation for adhesive strains in Bonded Composite Lap Joints, 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Schaumburg, IL: Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 2008. Paper No. 2008–1844 Paper No. 2008-1844Google Scholar
  14. Colavito KW, Gorman J, Madenci E: Refinements in Digital Image Correlation Technique to extract Adhesive Strains in Lap joints”. Palm Springs, California: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 4–7 May 2009; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Comer AJ, Katnam KB, Stanley WF, Young TM: Characterising the behaviour of composite single lap bonded joints using digital image correlation. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 40: 215–223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Banea M, da Silva LFM: Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives. J Adhes 2009, 85: 261–285. 10.1080/00218460902881808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoang-Ngoc CT, Paroissien E: Simulation of single-lap bonded and hybrid (bolted/bonded) joints with flexible adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 2010, 30: 117–129. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lubowiecka I, Rodrí́guez M, Rodrí́guez E, Martí́nez D: Experimentation, material modelling and simulation of bonded joints with a flexible adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 2012, 37: 56–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Banea MD, da Silva LFM: Static and fatigue behaviour of room temperature vulcanizing silicone adhesives for high temperature aerospace applications. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech 2010, 41(5):325–335. 10.1002/mawe.201000605View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Banea MD, da Silva LFM: The effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesives for the automotive industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L. J Mater Des Appl 2010, 224(2):51–62.Google Scholar
  21. Nunes LCS, Moreira DC: Simple shear under large deformation: experimental and theoretical analyses. Eur J Mech A Solids 2013, 42: 315–322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreira DC, Nunes LCS: Comparison of simple and pure shear for an incompressible isotropic hyperelastic material under large deformation. Polymer Test 2013, 32: 240–248. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dally JW, Riley WF: Experimental Stress Analysis. 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW: Image Correlation for Shape. New York: Motion and Deformation Measurements. Springer Science and Business Media LCC; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Nunes LCS: Shear modulus estimation of the polymer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using digital image correlation. Mater Des 2010, 31: 583–588. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Adams RD, Chambers SH, Del Strother PJA, Peppiatt NA: Rubber model for adhesive lap joints. J Strain Anal Eng Des 1973, 8: 52–57. 10.1243/03093247V081052View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Moreira and Nunes; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.