Experimental analysis of bonded single lap joint with flexible adhesive
© Moreira and Nunes; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 27 August 2013
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 29 January 2014
Flexible adhesives play an important role in various applications. The possibility of bonding dissimilar substrates has generated wide interest in flexible adhesives. However, most of the theoretical and experimental investigations have focused on rigid epoxy adhesives. The purpose of this work is to investigate the mechanical behavior of a flexible adhesive joint in the overlap region. Aluminum adherends were used for single lap joint made with an adhesive characterized by high flexibility and large strains. The specimen was tested in tension. Full-field displacements of the overlap region were measured by the Digital Image Correlation method. A large shear strain of the order of 48% was observed. Small transverse deflections of the adherends were estimated. Also, it was observed that the shear strain distribution in the adhesive layer decreases at the overlap ends, which is different from previously reported results in the literature.
KeywordsFlexible adhesive Single lap joint Digital image correlation
Knowledge of adhesion has a great importance for many bonded structures, mainly in automotive, aircraft and marine structures. A better understanding of the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded joints necessitates a detailed investigation of the adherend and adhesive, as well as of the adherend-adhesive interface. The majority of stiff adhesives are employed in structural applications, while flexible adhesives are indicated for some particular cases. The use of flexible adhesives in engineering structures allows displacement between joints and can avoid structural failure. For instance, they may be used for bonding dissimilar substrates that present different coefficients of thermal expansion.
Several investigations have been concerned with mechanical behavior of bonded joints. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints were established through the efforts of Volkersen , Goland and Reissner  and Hart-Smith . An improvement to classical models of bonded lap joints has been proposed by Tsai et al. . Luo and Tong  presented a nonlinear analysis of single lap joints. A good literature review on theoretical models for bonded joints is summarized in the literature [6, 7]. Recent publications show that bonded joints remain being extensively studied [8–10]. Full-field optical methods such as Moiré and Digital Image Correlation have been employed to determine strain fields of adhesively bonded joints [11–15].
Although there are many works on adhesively bonded joints, only a relatively few involve flexible adhesives. For instance, two different flexible adhesives were investigated by means of adhesive joint tests . Stress distributions in single lap joint made with flexible adhesive were studied using finite element analysis . Recently, experiments and simulations of single lap bonded joints and their application in a boat structure were presented . In addition, the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesive and the mechanical behavior of different flexible adhesives were analyzed [19, 20].
This study was designed to investigate experimentally the mechanical behavior of a flexible adhesive joint in the overlap region. Aluminum adherends were used for single lap joint (SLJ) made with an adhesive characterized by high flexibility and large strains. The specimen was tested under monotonic tensile load in quasi-static condition. For each load, an image of the overlap region of the specimen was captured. All images were processed using a homemade program based on the Digital Image Correlation. Thus, horizontal and vertical displacement fields were obtained.
The displacement fields were measured using an optical method, which is known as Digital Image Correlation (DIC). This powerful optical-numerical method measures full-field surface displacements. DIC method is noncontact and relatively noninvasive. In the correlation procedure, small subsets from the undeformed image are compared to subsets from each of the deformed images in order to match maximum correlation between them and hence the displacements are determined. If the initial position of each subset is known, and its final position can be estimated, it is possible to compute the in-plane displacement fields designated by u(x, y) and v(x, y) associated with x- and y-coordinates. More information about this method can be found in the literature [23, 24].
In the current work, a homemade DIC code based on a normalized cross-correlation function was used to obtain displacement fields with accuracy of the order of ±0.01 pixels. All acquired images were selected at 1314x199 pixel resolution. In order to perform the matching process, reference and target subsets of 51x51 and 31x31 were respectively chosen. The system was calibrated considering a scale factor value equal to 38 pixel/mm.
Results and discussion
As previously described in Section 2, one end of the lower adherend was kept fixed to the apparatus while the other end was bonded to the upper adherend, in which the load was applied. It is important to remark that no type of failures was observed, considering the applied loads. As can be seen in Figure 4, there is no horizontal displacement of the lower adherend, while the upper adherend presents an uniform displacement on the order of 0.07 mm and no significant deformation of the adherend is observed. Accordingly, the adhesive deforms in shear. Moreover, it should be noted that both lower and upper adherends present a rotation in the x-y plane, as shown in Figure 5. Neglecting rotations and considering only the initial thickness of the adhesive layer (0.15 mm), an angular distortion equal to 0.47 is achieved.
It is well known that the eccentric load applied to a SLJ specimen generates a combined effect of bending moment and transverse force. The magnitude of each effect depends on adherend and adhesive stiffnesses, specimen geometry and loading conditions. In fact, shear is often associated with peeling forces. Works found in the literature indicate that the shear strain in the adhesive layer increases at the edge of the overlap. In the present case, however, a different result was observed. It is important to emphasize that the adhesive stiffness used in this work is low in comparison to the adherends stiffness. Also, the adhesive is an elastomer, such that it is characterized by high flexibility and large deformation. Adams et al. investigated two types of joint configuration that remove the stress concentration from the ends of the lap by profiling the adhesive layer. They used different rubbers to represent the adherends and adhesives and concluded that an adhesive joint could display a lower shear stress at the ends of the lap than in the middle, due to joint configuration. For that reason, the obtained results in the current work are suitable.
The behavior of a single lap joint made with a flexible adhesive and aluminum adherends was experimentally investigated. The Digital Image Correlation method was employed for estimating the horizontal and vertical displacement fields at the overlap region of the single lap joint specimen. Vertical displacements associated to small adherend deflections were observed. Results indicate that the adhesive thickness was not equal along the horizontal coordinate. In fact, adhesive thickness was larger at the edge of the overlap due to eccentric loads and adhesive stiffness. Using the measured displacements, values of shear and normal strains in the adhesive layer were determined. Contrary to results from previous works found in the literature, shear strain decreased at the edge of the overlap. It is important to remark that a similar effect was observed by Adams et al. It should be noted that this study has examined only displacements and deformation. As a closing remark, one should mention that the current work might be used to support recent investigation based on finite element method. Moreover, analytical models of adhesively bonded joints may be developed assuming that the adhesive is a hyperelastic material.
The financial support of Rio de Janeiro State Funding, FAPERJ, and Research and Teaching National Council, CNPq, are gratefully acknowledged.
- Volkersen O: Die Nietkraftverleitung in zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen mit konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtforschung 1938, 15: 41–47.Google Scholar
- Goland M, Reissner E: The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech 1944, 11: A17-A27.Google Scholar
- Hart-Smith JL: Analysis and Design of Advanced Composite Bonded joints. Washington-DC: NASA Report, no. CR- 2218; 1974.Google Scholar
- Tsai MY, Oplinger DW, Morton J: Improved theoretical solutions for adhesive lap joints. Int J Solids Struct 1998, 35: 1163–1185. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo Q, Tong L: Fully-coupled nonlinear analysis of single lap adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct 2007, 44: 2349–2370. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, Spelt JK: Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part I: Literature survey. Int J Adhes Adhes 2009, 29: 319–330. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, Wang A, Spelt JK: Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: Comparative study. Int J Adhes Adhes 2009, 29: 331–341. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karachalios EF, Adams RD, da Silva LFM: Strength of single lap joints with artificial defects. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 45: 69–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vijaya Kumar RL, Bhat MR, Murthy CRL: Evaluation of kissing bond in composite adhesive lap joints using digital image correlation: Preliminary studies. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 42: 60–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernasconi A, Jamil A, Moroni F, Pirondi A: A study on fatigue crack propagation in thick composite adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fatigue 2013, 50: 18–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsai MY, Morton J: An experimental investigation of nonlinear deformations in single-lap joints. Mech Mater 1995, 20: 183–194. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00056-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moutrille MP, Derrien K, Baptiste D, Balandraud X, Grédiac M: Through-thickness strain field measurement in a composite/aluminum adhesive joint. Compos Part A 2009, 40(8):985–996. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colavito KW, Das M, Hahs D, Gorman J, Madenci E, Smeltzer SS III: Digital Image Correlation for adhesive strains in Bonded Composite Lap Joints, 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Schaumburg, IL: Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 2008. Paper No. 2008–1844 Paper No. 2008-1844Google Scholar
- Colavito KW, Gorman J, Madenci E: Refinements in Digital Image Correlation Technique to extract Adhesive Strains in Lap joints”. Palm Springs, California: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 4–7 May 2009; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Comer AJ, Katnam KB, Stanley WF, Young TM: Characterising the behaviour of composite single lap bonded joints using digital image correlation. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013, 40: 215–223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Banea M, da Silva LFM: Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives. J Adhes 2009, 85: 261–285. 10.1080/00218460902881808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoang-Ngoc CT, Paroissien E: Simulation of single-lap bonded and hybrid (bolted/bonded) joints with flexible adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 2010, 30: 117–129. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lubowiecka I, Rodrí́guez M, Rodrí́guez E, Martí́nez D: Experimentation, material modelling and simulation of bonded joints with a flexible adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 2012, 37: 56–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Banea MD, da Silva LFM: Static and fatigue behaviour of room temperature vulcanizing silicone adhesives for high temperature aerospace applications. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech 2010, 41(5):325–335. 10.1002/mawe.201000605View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Banea MD, da Silva LFM: The effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesives for the automotive industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L. J Mater Des Appl 2010, 224(2):51–62.Google Scholar
- Nunes LCS, Moreira DC: Simple shear under large deformation: experimental and theoretical analyses. Eur J Mech A Solids 2013, 42: 315–322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moreira DC, Nunes LCS: Comparison of simple and pure shear for an incompressible isotropic hyperelastic material under large deformation. Polymer Test 2013, 32: 240–248. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dally JW, Riley WF: Experimental Stress Analysis. 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
- Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW: Image Correlation for Shape. New York: Motion and Deformation Measurements. Springer Science and Business Media LCC; 2009.Google Scholar
- Nunes LCS: Shear modulus estimation of the polymer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using digital image correlation. Mater Des 2010, 31: 583–588. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams RD, Chambers SH, Del Strother PJA, Peppiatt NA: Rubber model for adhesive lap joints. J Strain Anal Eng Des 1973, 8: 52–57. 10.1243/03093247V081052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.