Open Access

Molecular simulation on carbon dioxide fixation routes towards synthesis of precursors for innovative urethanes

  • Vinicius Carrillo Beber1,
  • Lucas Taveira Caleiro1, 2,
  • Kelen Rossi de Aguiar1, 3,
  • Jan-Ole Joswig4,
  • Ubirajara Pereira Rodrigues Filho3,
  • Paul-Ludwig Michael Noeske1,
  • Klaus Rischka1 and
  • Welchy Leite Cavalcanti1Email author
Applied Adhesion Science20153:3

DOI: 10.1186/s40563-014-0028-7

Received: 20 November 2014

Accepted: 5 December 2014

Published: 1 March 2015

Abstract

Classical molecular dynamics were carried out in order to obtain insights into proper conditions to perform chemical fixation of carbon dioxide (CO2) with epoxide molecules into cyclic carbonates. Two different molecules containing epoxide groups were investigated: 1,2–Epoxybutane (EB), called linear aliphatic epoxide molecule, and 3-Ethyl-7-oxabicyclo(4.1.0)heptane (EC), called cycloaliphatic epoxide molecule. The reaction systems involving carbon dioxide additionally were catalyzed by tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB). The dynamics of the molecular groups were studied by taking into account known reaction mechanisms to investigate whether the optimal reaction conditions were observed.

Radial distribution functions and self-diffusion coefficients were calculated and revealed that in case of the systems with cycloaliphatic epoxide groups as reagent the CO2 molecules were located far away from the agglomerate formed by the dispersed tetraethylammonium bromide catalyst and epoxide groups (EC), and they do not present enough mobility to overcome the long distances to react. Additionally, it was observed that, in the case of the linear aliphatic epoxide groups (EB), the dynamics of the groups tends to facilitate the reaction mechanisms by presenting a considerable amount of available CO2 molecules in the neighborhood of the epoxy rings. Thus, via the Molecular Dynamics insights, the systems containing linear aliphatic epoxide groups presented a much more accessible condition for the subsequent reaction steps of the carbon dioxide fixation to occur as compared to systems containing cycloaliphatic epoxide groups. The simulation results are in agreement with the experimental findings, which showed via infrared spectroscopy the successful conversion of epoxy rings from linear aliphatic epoxide molecules into five-membered cyclic carbonates after reacting with carbon dioxide.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide fixation Molecular dynamics Reaction conditions

Background

Environmental issues and sustainability appeal have a strong impact on the development of novel chemistry approaches in order to synthesize materials via eco-friendly routes. Among the worldwide current environmental and economic concerns is the need to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) released to the atmosphere by a wide range of human activities such as burning of fossil fuels, mineral extraction, bio-ethanol production, etc. [1-3]. A further impact of environmental requests is on the search for alternative chemical routes for polymeric materials industry [3], as for instance for the synthesis of polyurethanes (PUs). PUs are very versatile materials and present an extremely strong bonding, consequently PUs are vastly used in applications such as plastics, and used matrices for fiber-reinforced polymers or as adhesives [4,5]. Furthermore, PUs are applied in marine, transportation, automotive, furniture and food packaging industries or coatings on many different materials due to the improvement of properties like appearance and life time. However, the usual synthesis of PUs relies on isocyanate reactions, i.e. involving toxic compounds. K.R. Aguiar et al. [6] have shown an alternative route to tackle the challenges of reducing CO2 emissions and simultaneously forming urethanes based material via green routes instead of using isocyanates. In that work, the authors presented an efficient environmentally friendly synthesis of a bis(cyclic carbonate) poly (dimethylsiloxane) (CCPDMS) derivative via CO2 addition to yield precursor materials for the synthesis of innovative urethanes. Basically, the work profits from the ability of the catalyzed CO2 fixation using epoxides as reactants to produce cyclic carbonates [6]. The resulting CCPDMS can be applied to synthesize urethanes. Furthermore, K. R. Aguiar et al. presented the feasibility of reacting CCPDMS and (di)amines in solvent-free conditions. Although the route from the CO2 fixation with epoxides to the final urethanes synthesis is achieved by K. R. de Aguiar and co-authors, the yield of the CO2 fixation is strongly dependent on the accessible reaction steps, the appropriate conditions and chemical structures of the components. The understanding of those phenomena is extremely relevant. Several experimental and theoretical efforts [7-9] were performed in this direction, including the investigation of the reaction process, the design of the catalyst [10-13] and of the appropriate substituents at three-membered epoxide rings to form the desired products. Computer simulations represent powerful tools to support the experimentalists towards the development of novel materials. Via computational modelling, several features can be studied such as system dynamics or reaction mechanisms at short and large time and length scales [14-17]. Via density functional theory (DFT), J-Q. Wang and co-authors elucidated the reaction mechanisms for the CO2 fixation of ethylene oxide (EO) and of propylene oxide (PO) catalyzed by quaternary ammonium salts [7], identifying main three steps: (i) A nucleophilic attack of the bromide ion to the less hydrogenated carbon of the epoxide group occurs, forming a β-haloalkoxide anion; (ii) the new anion reacts with the CO2 molecule, generating a carbonate ion; (iii) in order to form the cyclic carbonate, the bromide acts as a leaving group regenerating the catalyst and obtaining the cyclic carbonate product. Furthermore, the intermediate and transition states were calculated, and aspects that influence the design of the catalysts were presented, such as the chain length of substituents at the epoxide group and the type of catalyst anion. In spite of the fact that calculations are scaled for short lengths and times, the quantum based methods, such as the DFT, provided important information on the mechanisms and the parameters which influence the reaction processes.

This study reports a molecular dynamics (MD) investigation to gain insights into the dynamical behavior of the molecular systems and its influence on the formation of the aspired products. Via classical MD calculations, no reactions are carried out. Nevertheless, the dynamics of a large scale system of reagents can be accessed. By MD simulations, it is feasible to know whether the system presents the optimal conditions required for the subsequent reaction steps to occur considering the reported steps of the reaction mechanism [7,18]. The computer simulations intend to support the understanding of the experimental findings, regarding the reaction to form molecules based on cyclic carbonates. Two different molecules containing epoxide groups were investigated; the 1,2 – Epoxybutane (EB) which is a linear aliphatic epoxide, and 3- Ethyl-7- oxabicyclo(4.1.0)heptane (EC) which is a cycloaliphatic epoxide; as catalyst tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB) was used. In addition, the present work reports experimental results on the CO2 fixation with epoxides. The experimental part also considered two different epoxide groups used as reagents: as a linear aliphatic epoxide the diglycidylether-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), and a cycloaliphatic epoxide the poly[dimethylsiloxane-co-(2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl)methylsiloxane] (CPDMS), and TEAB as catalyst.

In the next section, the computational and experimental methods and materials are detailed explained. In the sequence, the results and discussion section is dedicated to present the radial distribution functions and diffusion coefficients calculated using the produced MD trajectories; furthermore the experimental findings are presented. Finally, the main conclusions are summarized.

Methods

For the computational part, classical Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations were performed using the software packages MAPS© (Materials and Processes Simulation Platform) [19] and LAMMPS© (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) [20,21]. The simulation cells were composed by three different molecule groups: epoxide groups, CO2 molecules, and the catalyst groups. As epoxide groups, a linear aliphatic epoxide the 1,2 – Epoxybutane (EB) and a cycloaliphatic epoxide the 3-Ethyl-7-oxabicyclo(4.1.0)heptane (EC) were investigated. The catalyst used in both cases was a dispersed tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB) unit. The simulation cells were created using the Amorphous builder tool of MAPS©. The overview of molecular groups and their stoichiometry considered in the simulation boxes are presented in the Table 1. Regarding the computational parameters, all the systems were fully atomistically modelled and periodic boundary conditions were applied and the polymer consistent force field (pcff) used.
Table 1

Computational systems considered and their respective stoichiometry

Computational system 1 CS1-EB

Stoichiometry

Total number of atoms in Computational Cell

EB

CO2

TEAB

 

100

50

1

2960

Computational system 2 CS2-EC

Stoichiometry

Total number of atoms in Computational Cell

EC

CO2

TEAB

 

100

50

1

4960

For each system, a geometry optimization (steepest descent and conjugated gradient, in cascade) was performed. Afterwards, a 1 ns equilibration run was carried out composed of a 500 ps run in the canonical ensemble (NVT) followed by a 500 ps run in the isothermal–isobaric ensemble (NPT) with an isotropic pressure coupling using a Nosé–Hoover thermostat. For both systems CS1-EB and CS2-EC, the temperature was 298 K and the pressure 11.0 bar. For the CS1-EB system the 500 ps NVT equilibration run had an initial density of 0.5 g/cm3. For the CS2-EC the 1 ns equilibration run was done as follows: a total of 500 ps NVT run in 3 steps (200, 200 and 100 ps), followed by a 500 ps NPT run. After proper equilibration for both systems a 1 ns production run was carried out using NPT at 298 K and 11.0 bar, the trajectories were collected each 1 ps for analyses.

For the experimental part, two different systems were investigated, formed by epoxide groups, CO2 molecules, catalyst and additionally a solvent. The difference in the experimental reagent systems was in the chemistry of the epoxide groups, since a linear aliphatic epoxide the diglycidylether-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), and a cycloaliphatic epoxide the poly[dimethylsiloxane-co-(2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl)methylsiloxane] (CPDMS) were used. As catalyst and solvent, the TEAB and the 2-ethoxyethanol (EG) were used respectively. The two experimental systems are listed in Table 2 considering the molecular groups and their respective quantities used for the experiment. The optimal reaction conditions were determined by “trial and error” method varying pressure, temperature and time. The reagents and catalyst were dissolved in the EG solvent and transferred to the reactor cup. The system was closed and filled with CO2, following the experimental procedure published by Aguiar and co-authors [6]. The formation of reaction products for the two different epoxide systems was followed by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Table 2

Experimental systems considered and the respective quantities used

Experimental System 1 ES1-PDMS

Reagents

PDMS

CO2

TEAB

EG

12.4 mmol

excess

1% w

40 mL

Experimental System 2 ES2-CPDMS

Reactants

CPDMS

CO2

TEAB

EG

12.4 mmol

charged in reactor

1% w or 2% w

40 mL

Results and discussion

The discussion of the results will take into account the reaction mechanism and the resulting reaction steps reported in literature [7,18]. A general concept of the reaction mechanism is sketched in Scheme 1, presenting three main reaction steps: (I) the catalyst approaching the epoxy ring where the bromide anion Br- will attack the C atom forming the intermediate specie (II) the CO2 fixation takes place (III) and the cyclic carbonate is formed.
Scheme 1

Reaction mechanisms of CO 2 fixation with epoxide to form cyclic carbonates.

Regarding the experimental part, the Scheme 2 presents the CO2 addition to the diepoxide yielding cyclic carbonate molecules for the two experimental systems studied.
Scheme 2

Expected reaction of CO 2 with diepoxide yielding cyclic carbonate based molecules. Left: Experimental System 1 (ES1 - PDMS). Right: Experimental System 2 (ES2 - CPDMS).

Figure 1 presents infrared spectroscopy results for both experimental systems. The upper spectra for ES1 show the formation of cyclic carbonate as seen by the C = O band (ES1-CCPDMS); the results are as obtained by K. Aguiar et al. [6]. Nevertheless, for the ES2 the aspired reactions did not occur since no cyclic carbonate was formed as shown by the absence of the C = O peak in the ES2-CCPDMS.
Figure 1

Superimposed infrared spectra. Upper: ES1 - reagent PDMS (dashed line) and product CCPDMS (solid line). Bottom: ES2 - reagent CPDMS (dashed line) and reaction mixture without indicating formation of a product CCPDMS (solid line).

The experimental results revealed the success of obtaining cyclic carbonate molecules when using as reagent the linear aliphatic epoxide (PDMS), while the use of the cycloaliphatic epoxide (CPDMS) as reagent did not yield the expected products in the conditions investigated.

The MD calculations provided the access to a 1 ns dynamics of the systems in intervals of 1 ps between the frames. Although the classical MD method as applied does not allow considering chemical reactions, the access to the dynamics permits obtaining insights by revealing the development of the reaction regions and groups during a certain time interval. Analyses of the radial distribution function (RDF) provide the information on the distances where groups of atom pairs which are of interest for the reaction can be found together first. The RDF calculations take into account the volume available to the system and the total number of particles or atoms, i.e. the density, as well as the number of available atoms of the type for which the RDF is calculated. Considering the difference in the system densities, the RDF analyzes presented intend to provide the distances where the first pairs are found (in RDF plot the x-axis), while the values found for the RDF (in RDF plot the y-axis) for the different systems are not comparable due to the different available volume. To select for which pairs the RDF were to be collected advantageously, the reaction steps (I), (II) and (III) within the mechanism of Scheme 1 were taken into account. Thus, the first pairs investigated were concerning reaction step (I) to evaluate the distances between catalyst cation ((H5C2)4 N+) and anion (Br) for both simulation systems CS1 and CS2. Figure 2 presents the RDF for the Br and ammonium+ within the TEAB catalyst moieties. The peak in the RDF appears in both cases at a distance of 4.25 Å, and no difference among the reaction systems regarding step (I) of the reaction mechanism can be seen by evaluating the interatomic distances within the catalyst. This finding might indicate that, considering the dynamics, the whole catalyst anion-cation pair is diffusing together inside the simulation box, and no anion-cation dissociation is clearly presented during the dynamics. The value 4.25 Å may be expected for the anion-cation distance within the undissociated TEAB catalyst [22,23].
Figure 2

RDF for the distances between the Br and ammonium + within the TEAB catalyst molecules for the both simulation systems CS1 and CS2. Upper: CS1-EB, the inset contains the illustration of the atom groups of the TEAB molecule for which the RDF was calculated. Bottom: CS2-EC.

Following the reaction mechanism, the next RDF analyzed considered the step when the epoxide group is to be attacked by the bromide ion. Thus, the RDF is calculated for the distances between the Br from the TEAB moieties and the carbon atoms of the epoxide rings to be attacked. The distances considered are sketched in the molecules drawn in the inset in Figure 3. The upper RDF is for the system CS1, and the bottom one shows the findings for the system CS2. The CS2 has two possible carbon atoms in the epoxide (Cepoxide) rings where the bromide could attack. The different density of the systems and also the different amount of available atoms within the simulation cell volume results in the distinct range of ordinate values of the RDF plot. Nevertheless, the profile of the RDF for Br and Cepoxide does not reveal any relevant difference between CS1 or CS2 which might indicate that CS1 and CS2 would have different accessibilities for reacting considering the reaction step (I).
Figure 3

RDF for the distances between the Br of the TEAB catalyst molecules and one C atom of the epoxide molecules for both simulation systems. Upper: CS1. Bottom: CS2. The atoms among which the RDF is taken are illustrated in the inset sketch.

The estimative of the amount of pairs found at a certain distance can be taken from the integral over the RDF curve. The integral of the RDF of Figure 3 is presented in Figure 4 normalized with relation to the number of available pairs. Comparing the integral for both systems, no pronounced difference in the available number of Br and Cepoxide pairs in the first peak neighborhood is observed. Then, regarding the reaction step (I), both systems CS1 and CS2 are in comparable condition for the reaction to occur when only the dynamics is analyzed.
Figure 4

Integral of the RDF for pairs of Br of the TEAB catalyst molecules and the C atoms from the epoxide molecules for both simulation systems. Full line is the CS1. Dashed line is the CS2. The atoms considered in the pairs for which the integral of the RDF is taken are illustrated in the inset sketch.

In the next reaction step, i.e. step II of Scheme 1, a CO2 molecule would approach an intermediate complex formed by the attack of the Br on the epoxide groups, i.e. in the next reaction step the base for an irreversible CO2 fixation would be laid. To evaluate the availability of atom pairs for the reaction step II to take place, the integral of the RDF between the C atom from a CO2 molecule and the O atom from the former epoxide ring were calculated for both systems and are presented in Figure 5. From the integral (Figure 5) and, from the system dynamics accessed by the classical MD technique, it is observed that the number of available pairs of CCO2 and Oepoxide for the CS1-EB systems is much higher in comparison to the CS2-EC. CS2-EC showed almost no CO2 molecules close to the O atoms of the epoxide groups even when considering distances of up to 10 Å.
Figure 5

Integral of the RDF for the pairs formed by the C atom in a CO 2 molecule and the O atom from the opened epoxide ring. Full line is the CS1. Dashed line is the CS2. The atoms considered in the pairs for which the integral of the RDF is taken are illustrated in the inset sketch.

For the reaction step II to take place, the CO2 molecules will have to approach considerably to the epoxide groups. As the results displayed in Figure 5 indicate, this seems to be much more difficult in the case of the CS2-EC than in case of CS1-EB. In the system CS2-EC the catalyst and the epoxide groups cluster together, and CO2 molecules result to be excluded from these aggregates, far away from the aspired reaction sites. The access for CO2 molecules by transport through the clusters formed by the epoxide groups and catalyst results to be limited. This finding provides a qualitative description of a non-optimal scenario for the reactions in case of the CS2-EC systems, since the transport of CO2 reagent towards the catalyst region appears to be hindered in this case.

Moreover, an additional system was investigated in order to evaluate if the cluster formation is influenced by the effect of the catalyst groups within the CS2-EC. Therefore, a system containing cycloaliphatic epoxide molecules, CO2 reagents and excluding the catalyst was investigated considering the same stoichiometry and conditions applied for the CS2-EC. It was observed that even when the catalyst is not present the clustering of the cycloaliphatic epoxide molecules occurs, and the CO2 molecules are located even further away of the epoxy rings as shown in the RDF integral in Figure 6. Thus, the catalyst in the conditions investigated influences slightly in the arrangement of CO2 molecules in relation to the clustering formed by the cycloaliphatic epoxide groups; however the amount of the CO2 available in the neighborhood of the epoxide reaction centers is extremely low.
Figure 6

Integral of the RDF for the pairs formed by the C atom in a CO 2 molecule and the O atom from the opened epoxide ring for system CS2-EC with and without considering catalyst. Dashed line is the original CS2-EC with catalyst. Full line is the CS2-EC without the presence of catalyst molecules. The atoms considered in the pairs for which the integral of the RDF is taken are illustrated in the inset sketch.

Self-diffusion coefficients were calculated to complement the analyses by estimating the mobility of the groups. Basically, the self-diffusion supports to evaluate whether the CO2 and epoxide molecules would have enough mobility to approach each other. The self-diffusion coefficients for each molecular group for each system were calculated using the Einstein relation [24,25] for 200 ps trajectories. The obtained values are presented in the Table 3. The self-diffusion coefficients for the CS2–EC system are slightly higher than the ones for the CS1-EB system; however they are in the same order of magnitude. Based on this similar order of self-diffusion values, the groups in both systems seem to have comparable mobility within the simulation box.
Table 3

Self-diffusion coefficients for each molecular group for both computational systems CS1-EB and CS2-EC

 

Molecular group

Diffusion D (10 −5 cm 2 s −1 )

Computational System 1 CS1 - EB

EB

2.70

CO2

2.25

TEAB

2.32

Computational System 2 CS2 - EC

EC

6.65

CO2

6.64

TEAB

6.37

Combining the analyses of the integral of the RDFs (Figure 5) and the dynamics accessed (Table 3), the CO2 molecules in CS2-EC have to travel much longer distances to be able to approach opened epoxide rings. Besides, there would be limitations caused by the stronger steric effect in the EC molecules compared to the EB ones. Those outcomes seem to hinder the reagents of the systems CS2-EC to proceed with the reaction steps within the mechanism for the CO2 fixation and formation of further cyclic carbonate based molecules. The effect of agglomeration and the resulting hindrance is mirrored in the observed experimental results which indicated a much faster and more effective CO2 fixation in case of linear aliphatic epoxide molecules as reagents as compared to cycloaliphatic epoxides.

Conclusions

The CO2 fixation with epoxides to form cyclic carbonate based molecules was investigated via computational and experimental work. In both experimental and computational part, two different epoxide groups were considered: a linear aliphatic epoxide and a cycloaliphatic epoxide. Experimentally, only the systems considering the linear aliphatic epoxide as reagent have successfully produced the cyclic carbonate based product as revealed by the infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The dynamics of model systems were accessed by classical MD simulations in order to investigate the conditions for the reactions steps to occur, taking into account a reaction mechanism reported in the literature. The analyses of the computational data were performed by radial distribution functions and self-diffusion coefficients calculations. It was observed for the system containing the linear aliphatic epoxide as reagent a large amount of CO2 available in the neighborhood of the epoxide reaction centers. Moreover, in the systems containing cycloaliphatic epoxide, the CO2 groups are located very far away of the epoxy rings and did not present enough mobility to overcome the long distances to react. In summary, the computational study of the dynamics showed a preferable condition for reactions to occur in the systems containing linear aliphatic epoxide as reagent when compared to cycloaliphatic containing systems; the results are in agreement with the experimental output.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are gratefully thankful to the Science without Borders Program (Ciência sem Fronteiras, L. Taveira Caleiro 88888.033101/2013-00, and V. Carrillo Beber 13458/13-2) and the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES – Brazil).The authors would like to thank the financial support by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) within Grants 2011/06019-0, 2011/08120-0 and 2013/05279-3. Additionally, the authors acknowledge the financial support by German academic exchange service (DAAD) from resources of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the PROBRAL I (25/2013)-CAPES/DAAD project ID 57060300.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM
(2)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Estrada Municipal do Campinho, University of Sao Paulo
(3)
Institute of Chemistry of Sao Carlos, Department of Chemistry and Molecular Physics, University of Sao Paulo
(4)
Theoretical Chemistry, Erich-Müller-Bau, Room 208, Technical University of Dresden

References

  1. D’Alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR: Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49(35):6058–6082.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Braswell BH, Apps MJ, Baker D, Bondeau A, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning AS, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo JM, Moore B, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala SW, Prentice IC, Raupach MR, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Steffen WL, Wirth C: Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 2001, 414(6860):169–172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Darensbourg DJ: Making plastics from carbon dioxide: salen metal complexes as catalysts for the production of polycarbonates from epoxides and CO 2 . Chem Rev 2007, 107(6):2388–2410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chattopadhyay DK, Raju K: Structural engineering of polyurethane coatings for high performance applications. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32(3):352–418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Osman MA, Mittal V, Morbidelli M, Suter UW: Polyurethane adhesive nanocomposites as gas permeation barrier. Macromolecules 2003, 36(26):9851–9858.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Aguiar KR, Santos VG, Eberlin MN, Rischka K, Noeske M, Tremiliosi-Filho G, Rodrigues-Filho UP: Efficient green synthesis of bis(cyclic carbonate)poly(dimethylsiloxane) derivative using CO 2 addition: a novel precursor for synthesis of urethanes. RSC Adv 2014, 4(46):24334.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang J, Dong K, Cheng W, Sun J, Zhang S: Insights into quaternary ammonium salts-catalyzed fixation carbon dioxide with epoxides. Catal Sci Technol 2012, 2(7):1480.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Castro-Gómez F, Salassa G, Kleij AW, Bo C: A DFT study on the mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction of CO 2 to epoxides catalyzed by Zn(Salphen) complexes. Chem Eur J 2013, 19(20):6289–6298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Sun H, Zhang D: Density functional theory study on the cycloaddition of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide catalyzed by alkylmethylimidazolium chlorine ionic liquids. J Phys Chem A 2007, 111(32):8036–8043.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang T, Xie Y, Deng W: Reaction mechanism of epoxide cycloaddition to CO 2 catalyzed by salen-M (M = Co, Al, Zn). J Phys Chem A 2014, 118(39):9239–9243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen X, Sun J, Wang J, Cheng W: Polystyrene-bound diethanolamine based ionic liquids for chemical fixation of CO 2 . Tetrahedron Lett 2012, 53(22):2684–2688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ma J, Liu J, Zhang Z, Han B: The catalytic mechanism of KI and the co-catalytic mechanism of hydroxyl substances for cycloaddition of CO 2 with propylene oxide. Green Chem 2012, 14(9):2410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Darensbourg D: Catalysts for the reactions of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Coord Chem Rev 1996, 153:155–174.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Arab B, Shokuhfar A: Molecular dynamics simulation of cross-linked epoxy polymers - the effect of force field on the estimation of properties. J Nano Electronic Phys 2013, 5(1):01013 1–01013 5.Google Scholar
  15. Cavalcanti WL, Marschall R, Tölle P, Köhler C, Wark M, Frauenheim T: Insight into proton conduction of immobilised imidazole systems via simulations and impedance spectroscopy. Fuel Cells 2008, 8(3–4):244–253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavalcanti WL, Noeske PLM: Investigating Dynamic Interactions by Multi-Scale Modelling: From Theory to Applications. In Chemical Modelling, Volume 11. Edited by Springborg M, Joswig JO. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2014:175–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao L, Fu Y, Liang X, Mei L, Liu Y: Diffusion of CO 2 molecules in polyethylene terephthalate/polylactide blends estimated by molecular dynamics simulations. Bull Kor Chem Soc 2013, 34(3):753–758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Caló V, Nacci A, Monopoli A, Fanizzi A: Cyclic carbonate formation from carbon dioxide and oxiranes in tetrabutylammonium halides as solvents and catalysts. Org Lett 2002, 4(15):2561–2563.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Scienomics Inc.: MAPS (The Materials And Processes Simulations platform). Scienomics 2013, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. Plimpton S: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1995, 117(1):1–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. LAMMPS. http://lammps.sandia.gov/. Accessed 19 November 2014
  22. Wang Q, Habenschuss A, Xenopoulos A, Wunderlich B: Mesophases of alkylammonium salts. VI. The crystal structures of tetra- n -butylammonium bromide and iodide. Molecular crystals and liquid crystals science and technology. Section A. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 1995, 264(1):115–129.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Elsegood MRJ: Tetra- n -butylammonium bromide: a redetermination at 150 K addressing the merohedral twinning. Acta Crystallogr E Struct Rep Online 2011, 67(10):o2599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Einstein A: Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. New York: Dover; 1926.Google Scholar
  25. Einstein A: Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann Phys 1905, 322(8):549–560.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carrillo Beber et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.